Alex Alien AIDS Archive

"The most formidable barrier to the advancement of science is the conventional wisdom of the dominant group."

Conrad Hal Waddington, Embryologist & Geneticist (1905 - 1975).

"Never doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world; indeed it is the only thing that ever has."

Margaret Mead, Cultural Anthropologist, (1901 - 1978).

"All truth goes through three stages. First it is ridiculed. Then it is violently opposed. Finally, it is accepted as self-evident."
                                                                                                     

Arthur Schopenhauer  (1788 - 1860).

"There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS - for many reasons but most importantly, because there is no proof that HIV exists."

Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos,  Is HIV the cause of AIDS?, Continuum, Autumn 1997.

"The HIV hypothesis ranks with the 'bad air' theory for malaria and the 'bacterial infection' theory of beriberi and pellagra [caused by nutritional deficiencies]. It is a hoax that became a scam."

 Dr. Bernard Forscher, Conspiracy of Silence, The Sunday Times, 3 April 1994.

"It is a dire example of how a distinguished scholar who has contributed much to the advancement of science, now impedes further progress by his stubborn adherence to a dogma of his own creation." 

“An error can never become true however many times you repeat it. The truth can never be wrong, even if no one ever hears about it. Truth alone will endure; all the rest will be swept away before the tide of time.” 

Mahatma Gandhi (1869 - 1948).

"Here we encounter the dogmatic stupidity proper to a signifier as such, the stupidity which assumes the shape of a tautology: a name refers to an object because this object is called that... "

Slavoj Zizek, The Sublime Object of Ideology, Verso, 1989.

"Scientists will then have to come to terms with the awful fact that the AIDS epidemic was a mirage manufactured by scientists who believed that integrity could be maintained amidst the diverting influences of big money, prestige and politics."

Professor Hiram Caton, Conspiracy of Silence, The Sunday Times, April 1994.

"I propose there are no human retroviruses. 'HIV' is not Human, it has never been proven to be the cause of Immunodeficiency, and is not a Virus, but a misinterpreted artefact of human and simian cell cultures. Therefore the acronym 'HIV' is wrong on all counts."

Michel Verney-Elliott, 'SIV' and Poliovaccination - A Shot In The Foot?, 1999.

"My work as a mathematical biologist has been built in large part on the paradigm that HIV causes AIDS, and I have since come to realize that there is good evidence that the entire basis for this theory is wrong. AIDS, it seems, is not a disease so much as a sociopolitical construct that few people understand and even fewer question...Why have we as a society been so quick to accept a theory for which so little solid evidence exists?...For over twenty years, the general public has been greatly misled and ill-informed."

Rebecca V. Culshaw, Ph.D., Why I Quit HIV; Lew Rockwell, March 3, 2006.

"I found that when they are speaking about HIV they are not speaking about a virus. They are speaking about cellular characteristics and activities of cells under very special conditions...I realized that the whole group of viruses to which HIV is said to belong, the retroviruses, in fact do not exist at all."

Dr. Stefan Lanka, Virologist,  Zenger's, December, 1998.

"Where is the research that says HIV is the cause of AIDS? If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There is no such document." 

Dr. Kary Mullis, Biochemist, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry, The Sunday Times,  28 November 1993.

"A thing is what it is not because of its place in the ideal classification system but because of its place in real history. The order of concretely existing things is from now on determined not by ideal essences outside them but by the historical forces buried within them."  

 Gary Cutting, Michel Foucault's Archeology of Scientific Reason, Cambridge University Press, 1989.

"The HIV-causes-AIDS dogma represents the grandest and perhaps the most morally destructive fraud that has ever been perpetrated on the young men and women of the Western world."

Dr. Charles Thomas, Conspiracy of Silence, The Sunday Times, April 1994.

"All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth....Every elevation of man brings with it the overcoming of narrower interpretations...every strengthening and increase of power opens up new perspectives and means believing in new horizons."

Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900).

"I have attended, as a reporter, eight International AIDS Conferences. They are uniformly awful, a total waste of a journalist’s time. Mostly I go just to fortify my belief that AIDS - the entire industry and social machinery of it - is at its root a totalitarian system. By that, I mean that there is a central ideology that seeks to enforce its domination by methodically obstructing any ideas that run counter to it." 

Celia Farber, Fear & Loathing in Geneva, Impressions Magazine, 24 August, 1998.

"To an extent that undermines classical standards of science, some purported scientific results concerning 'HIV' and 'AIDS' have been handled by press releases, by disinformation, by low-quality studies, and by some suppression of information, manipulating the media and people at large. When the official scientific press does not report correctly, or obstructs views dissenting from those of the scientific establishment, it loses credibility and leaves no alternative but to find information elsewhere.."

"On the face of it, the designation of AIDS as the most significant threat to public health is nonsense...This catastrophic vision is the AIDS mirage. I call it a mirage because health authorities embrace a contingent future as an incontrovertible truth. The passion invested in the viral epidemic dogma is transferred to the entire AIDS management program, so that the whole is seized by cataleptic rigidity (a panic symptom). Our AIDS management systems are incapable of reviewing evidence which shows that there have been mistakes about HIV causality, mistakes of diagnosis, mistakes about its transmission, mistakes about HIV antibody tests, mistakes about therapies."

Professor Hiram Caton, Why We Need AIDS; The AIDS Mirage, 1995.

"It is a mistake to believe that a science consists in nothing but conclusively proved propositions, and it is unjust to demand that it should. It is a demand only made by those who feel a craving for authority in some form and a need to replace the religious catechism by something else, even if it be a scientific one. Science in its catechism has but few apodictic precepts; it consists mainly of statements which it has developed to varying degrees of probability. The capacity to be content with these approximations to certainty and the ability to carry on constructive work despite the lack of final confirmation are actually a mark of the scientific habit of mind."

Sigmund Freud (1856-1939). 

"Science is about making observations and trying to fit them into a theoretical framework. Having the theoretical framework allows us to make predictions about phenomena that we can then test. HIV 'science' long ago set off on a different path...People who ask simple, straightforward questions are labelled as loonies who are dangerous to public health...Yet HIV 'science' has declined so far that these elementary questions are addressed neither by the research groups themselves, nor the referees at Nature whose job it is to critique the papers before publication. But nobody in the HIV research community is at all bothered by this...One gets a remarkable sense of being disassociated from the real world when entering the realm of AIDS research."

Mark Craddock, HIV: Science by press conference; AIDS: VIrus- or Drug Induced?, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.

"I would like to present the evidence available to me in support of the hypothesis: a) that AIDS is a typical example of epidemic hysteria, b) that the epidemic has at its core an unconscious group delusion, which can be called the group-fantasy of scapegoating, c) that the combination of these unconscious group tensions brought about a subtle and sophisticated, but nevertheless sacrificial witch hunt, in which the participants were the Moral Majority, d) that these attacks resulted in an epidemic of depression based mostly on shame; e) that the core sign of AIDS, the reduction of cell-mediated response, is one of the typical vegetative signs of severe depression; f) that the epidemic represents, in the group’s unconscious fantasies, an equivalent war, during which the group keeps careful count of the sacrifices; g) and finally that, since the epidemic is psychogenic, the prediction can be made that the group will decide when it should be over (when they have ‘had enough’), a decision which will be broadcast to the group members through the media, so that after a suitable lag period the epidemic will resolve and the incidence will descend from epidemic to endemic levels."

Caspar Schmidt, The AIDS Cult; Asklepios Pagan Press, 1997.

                                                     Dedicated to the Memory of David Pasquarelli 

                                                            December 10th 1967 - March 8th 2004

                                                  HIV does not exist

Positive Nation, December 1997/January 1998

One of the most controversial figures on the British AIDS scene is Alex Russell (pictured), editor of the magazine Death Camp and researcher for Continuum magazine. He has long argued  that AIDS research and treatment are totally misdirected. Here he says that HIV simply does not exist.

In 14 years, the 'HIV' hypothesis has been unproductive and non-predictive because 'Aids'  is neither an infectious epidemic nor caused by 'HIV'. To date, 'HIV' has never been isolated as a unique, exogenous 'retrovirus'. Dr Robert Gallo and  Prof Luc Montagnier  announced the 'discovery' of a 'retrovirus' fully aware that there was no proof for it. Gallo and Montagnier published electron micrographs of a few particles which they claimed are a 'retrovirus' and are 'HIV'. But the photographs did not prove the particles were a virus.  Virologists Dr Stefan Lanka states: "The rules demonstrating the existence of HIV (and retroviruses in general) were never adhered to by those who devised them nor were they ever validated." (Continuum Vol.4, No.3) 'Retroviruses' (as a source of  reverse transcription) have never been proven to exist as biological entities.  All 'retroviruses' ('HIV', 'SIV', 'BIV', 'FIV', 'MIV') are hypothetical constructs. 'Retroviruses' are  an over-determination of the phenomenon of reverse transcription first discovered in 1970 by Howard Temin whilst  studying the Rous Sarcoma Virus. Reverse transcription is a normal process of cells associated with cellular repair mechanisms particularly of the cell membrane. Reverse transcription is not a property unique to hypothetical 'retroviruses' - it also occurs in hepatitis viruses as well as most mammalian and plant cells. 

There is no Universal Gold Standard 'HIV' test to prove 'HIV' positivity. The 'HIV' antibody test does not detect a 'virus' but an assortment of proteins that are non-specific to the hypothetical 'HIV'. The proteins that are used in the 'HIV' test are merely the biological outcome of stressed white blood cells used in the lab.  In 'Bio/Technology', June 1993, 'Aids' analyst, Dr Eleni Eleopulos  exposed the non-specificity and unreliability of the 'HIV' 'antibody test'.  Dr Eleopulos's critique supports the argument for the banning of the misleading 'HIV' tests. 

There can be no Gold Standard 'HIV' test because there is no Gold Standard 'HIV'  isolate. On each continent there are different criteria for 'HIV' positivity and 'Aids' definition. All evidence of 'HIV' positivity must be confirmed by pure culturing of a patient's lymphocytes and detection of whole, sell-free viral particles; so far this has never been achieved. 'HIV' is termed a 'lentivirus' ('slow virus'): lentiviruses are not known to be sexually transmitted.  

The hypothetical 'HIV' is not sexually transmitted: cell-free viral particles have never been found directly in semen.  In 'American Journal of Epidemiology' (Vol. 146, No.4), Nancy  S. Padian et al reported: "We estimate that  HIV  infectivity for male-to-female transmission is low, approximately 0.0009 per contact, and that infectivity for female-to-male transmission is even lower." 

Moreover, Dr David Ho admits that  99.8 per cent of putative 'HIV particles' are non-infectious; the remaining 0.2 per cent of 'viral particles' , being defective, are not capable of replication. As a transmittable entity, 'HIV' could not survive in nature. This indicates that  what we are calling 'HIV' is a misinterpreted, non-transmissible, endogenous epiphenomenon that should never have been classed as a virus. 'HIV' is an artefact of cell-culture invented by Dr Robert Gallo. The phenomena collectively known as 'HIV' are non-specific: reverse transcriptase is non-specific; PCR is non-specific; Viral Load is non-specific. Each property relating to 'HIV' can be shown to pertain to the cells used in co-cultivation experiments.  No particle of 'HIV' has ever been obtained pure, free of contaminants; nor has a complete piece  of 'HIV' RNA (or the transcribed DNA) ever been proved to exist. 

Dr John Papadimitriou states: "They have not proven that they  actually have detected a unique, exogenous retrovirus. The critical data to support that idea have not been presented. You have to be absolutely certain that what you have detected  is unique and exogenous, and a single molecular species....the proper controls have never been done. ('Aids: The failure of contemporary science', Neville Hodgkinson, Fourth Estate, 1996, page 375).  Dr Eleopulos and her colleagues argue that the greatest ingle obstacle to understanding and solving 'Aids' is 'HIV'.  'HIV' imprinting has become unconsciously internalised on such a global scale that people will not be able to accept the brute reality that 'HIV' does not exist.

Alex Russell

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Prime Minister Gordon Brown,

10 Downing Street, 

London  SW1A  2AA

Dear Prime Minister Gordon Brown,

Thank you for your letter of 16 April 2006 carefully noting my views.  

However you have missed my reason for writing to you, namely, to provide me with an electron micrograph of purified HIV particles.  

So once again I would be grateful if you could provide me with such an electron micrograph, as without such essential evidence all HIV testing procedures remain invalid and cannot be medically or legally justified.

London WC1N 1PE

 The Michael Verney-Elliott Memorial Prize: 

 £50,000 Reward for the Existence of 'HIV' 

 Offered by Mr. Alexander Huw Verney-Elliott. 

  Mahatma Gandhi (1869 - 1948)

"All truth goes through three stages. First it is ridiculed. Then it is violently opposed. Finally, it is accepted as self-evident."  

  Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 - 1860)                                                                                               

Prime Minister Gordon Brown                                                            

10 Downing Street,

29^th March, 2008

Dear Honourable Prime Minister Mr. Gordon Brown,

I would like to bring your attention to my reward of £50,000 for electron-micrograph (EM) evidence of the existence of HIV.

The non-isolation of HIV was the main theme of a satellite meeting 'HIV-testing; open questions regarding specificity' held at the 12th World AIDS Conference in Geneva in 1998. The International Forum for Accessible Science (IFAS) hosted this session with a panel of distinguished HIV critics including Professor Gordon Stewart, Professor Etienne de Harven. Ten years on, the isolation of HIV has not been proven.

Contributing to this session was a panel of scientists from Perth, Western Australia, led by biophysicist Eleni Eleopulos who argued that there had been no isolation of HIV according to the scientifically approved standards for retroviral isolation as discussed at the Pasteur Institute in 1973.

At the closing of press session I asked Richard Horton, then editor of The Lancet, and the 12th World AIDS Conference chairman, Dr. Bernard Hirschel: "The current indirect HIV tests and PCR are not sufficient proof that HIV has been isolated.  Where is the proof that HIV exists? "  None of the perplexed panel answered.

The alleged co-discoverers of HIV Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo agreed that to claim the existence of a new retrovirus the minimum necessary but not sufficient condition is to have electron microscopic (EM) evidence for the isolation (purification) of the putative retroviral particles.

In 1997 Montagnier admitted to the French journalist Djamel Tahi that the material, which in 1983 he claimed to represent purified HIV, did not even have particles with the "morphology typical of retroviruses" and stated: "I repeat we did not purify".   Prof. Gallo stated: "You have to purify." Yet when Montagnier was asked if the Gallo group purified 'HIV', he replied: "I don't know if he really purified. I don't believe so." (1)  

Dr. Heinz Ludwig Sänger, Emeritus Professor of Molecular Biology and Virology, Max-Planck-Institutes for Biochemy, München stated:   "Up to today there is actually no single scientifically really convincing evidence for the existence of HIV. Not even once such a retrovirus has been isolated and purified by the methods of classical virology." (2)

To date there is still no electron micrograph (EM) which shows purification of the putative HIV particles and thus of the existence of a unique, isolated retrovirus. What was wrongly taken to be 'purified HIV' was in fact cellular debris as Hans Gelderblom et al demonstrated in Virology, March 1997.  This brings urgently into question the validity, efficacy and legality of all hypothetical HIV testing procedures.

All images of the hypothetical HIV are invariably computerized fictions of virtual virology (often embellished with seductive psychedelic colours) and yet it has never been possible to visualize any HIV retroviral particle by EM. In summary, I request your office, and the Department of Health, obtain EM evidence for the existence of purified HIV particles.

I would like to conclude with a couple of quotes that aptly apply to Gallo and Montagnier:

"The most formidable barrier to the advancement of science is the conventional wisdom of the dominant group." 

C. H. Waddington, Geneticist.

"It is a dire example of how a distinguished scholar who has contributed much to the advancement of science, now impedes further progress by his stubborn adherence to a dogma of his own creation." 

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Maximen und Reflexionen, Texstelle 586.

References:

(1)            Luc Montagnier, Did Montagnier Discover HIV? Interview with Luc Montagnier, by Djamel Tahi; Continuum, Winter 1997.

(2)            Dr. Heinz Ludwig Sänger: Letter to Süddeutsche Zeitung 2000.

Yours sincerely,

Mr. Alexander Verney-Elliott,

London WC1N 1PE  

Letter To Prime Minister Gordon Brown: HIV Reward       04/02/08 01:23 AM

The Michael Verney-Elliott Memorial Prize: £50,000 Reward for the Existence of 'HIV' Offered by Mr. Alexander Huw Verney-Elliott. "An error can never become true however many times you repeat it. The truth can never be wrong, even if no one ever hears about it. Truth alone will endure; all the rest will be swept away before the tide of time." Mahatma Gandhi (1869 - 1948) "All truth goes through three stages. First it is ridiculed. Then it is violently opposed. Finally, it is accepted as self-evident." Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 - 1860) 29th March, 2008 Dear Honourable Prime Minister Mr. Gordon Brown, I would like to bring your attention to my reward of £50,000 for electron-micrograph (EM) evidence of the existence of HIV. The non-isolation of HIV was the main theme of a satellite meeting 'HIV-testing; open questions regarding specificity' held at the 12th World AIDS Conference in Geneva in 1998. The International Forum for Accessible Science (IFAS) hosted this session with a panel of distinguished HIV critics including Professor Gordon Stewart, Professor Etienne de Harven. Ten years on, the isolation of HIV has not been proven. Contributing to this session was a panel of scientists from Perth, Western Australia, led by biophysicist Eleni Eleopulos who argued that there had been no isolation of HIV according to the scientifically approved standards for retroviral isolation as discussed at the Pasteur Institute in 1973. At the closing of press session I asked Richard Horton, then editor of The Lancet, and the 12th World AIDS Conference chairman, Dr. Bernard Hirschel: "The current indirect HIV tests and PCR are not sufficient proof that HIV has been isolated. Where is the proof that HIV exists? " None of the perplexed panel answered. The alleged co-discoverers of HIV Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo agreed that to claim the existence of a new retrovirus the minimum necessary but not sufficient condition is to have electron microscopic (EM) evidence for the isolation (purification) of the putative retroviral particles. In 1997 Montagnier admitted to the French journalist Djamel Tahi that the material, which in 1983 he claimed to represent purified HIV, did not even have particles with the "morphology typical of retroviruses" and stated: "I repeat we did not purify". Prof. Gallo stated: "You have to purify." Yet when Montagnier was asked if the Gallo group purified 'HIV', he replied: "I don't know if he really purified. I don't believe so." (1) Dr. Heinz Ludwig Sänger, Emeritus Professor of Molecular Biology and Virology, Max-Planck-Institutes for Biochemy, München stated: "Up to today there is actually no single scientifically really convincing evidence for the existence of HIV. Not even once such a retrovirus has been isolated and purified by the methods of classical virology." (2) To date there is still no electron micrograph (EM) which shows purification of the putative HIV particles and thus of the existence of a unique, isolated retrovirus. What was wrongly taken to be 'purified HIV' was in fact cellular debris as Hans Gelderblom et al demonstrated in Virology, March 1997. This brings urgently into question the validity, efficacy and legality of all hypothetical HIV testing procedures. All images of the hypothetical HIV are invariably computerized fictions of virtual virology (often embellished with seductive psychedelic colours) and yet it has never been possible to visualize any HIV retroviral particle by EM. In summary, I request your office, and the Department of Health, obtain EM evidence for the existence of purified HIV particles. I would like to conclude with a couple of quotes that aptly apply to Gallo and Montagnier: "The most formidable barrier to the advancement of science is the conventional wisdom of the dominant group." C. H. Waddington, Geneticist. "It is a dire example of how a distinguished scholar who has contributed much to the advancement of science, now impedes further progress by his stubborn adherence to a dogma of his own creation." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Maximen und Reflexionen, Texstelle 586. References: (1) Luc Montagnier, Did Montagnier Discover HIV? Interview with Luc Montagnier, by Djamel Tahi; Continuum, Winter 1997. (2) Dr. Heinz Ludwig Sänger: Letter to Süddeutsche Zeitung 2000. Yours sincerely, Mr. Alexander Verney-Elliott, London WC1N 1PE

BOYCOTT Project (RED) Auction Sotheby’s       02/12/08 07:39 AM

SEE RED & BOYCOTT Project (RED) Auction Sotheby’s New York 14th February 2008 "An error can never become true however many times you repeat it. " Mahatma Gandhi (1869 - 1948). We are calling upon Bono of The (Project) Red Campaign, Damien Hirst, Gagosian Gallery, Sotheyby’s and participating artists donating work for the United Nations Foundation to Support HIV/AIDS Relief Programs in Africa to postpone The (RED) Auction in light of the lethal dangers of ART (anti-retroviral therapy) as extensively reported in the medical literature. The promotion of ART in Africa is leading toward pharmagenocide - direct medical killing. It is has been scientifically demonstrated that AZT and other ART drug regimes are actually causing Iatrogenic-AIDS - medically induced AIDS - or what Prof. Peter Duesberg calls: ‘AIDS by prescription’. Whilst ‘HIV’ has never been proven to cause AIDS the drugs used to treat it have been shown to produce symptoms indistinguishable from AIDS. The artists collaborating such as Georg Baselitz, Peter Blake, Tracey Emin, Antony Gormley, Subodh Gupta, Damien Hirst, Sir Howard Hodgkin, Gary Hume, Jasper Johns, Anish Kapoor, Anselm Kiefer, Jeff Koons, Richard Prince, Marc Quinn, Ed Ruscha, Rachel Whiteread, and Sam Taylor-Wood seem to be unaware of the sound and solid scientific arguments against anti-retroviral therapy (ART) as well as the fact that there is no visual EM (electron microscopic) evidence that ‘HIV’ exists (and EM is the only scientifically valid method for retroviral isolation). Would Cecily Brown, Tracey Emin, Rachel Whiteread and Sam Taylor-Wood really give their own babies AZT and ART? We applaud Chris Ofili and the other 20 artists for seeing RED and refusing taking part in this shameful Sotheby’s AIDS (ART) auction and ask all artists to pull out and stop propagating in this pernicious pharmagenocide profiteering. To end of a humorous note: playing at a recent U2 concert in Glasgow, Bono asked the audience for absolute quiet and then in the silence started to slowly clap his hands, once every few seconds. Holding the audience in total silence, he said into the microphone: "Every time I clap my hands, a child in Africa dies." A voice with a broad Scottish accent, from near the front of the crowd, pierces the silence: "Well, fucking stop doin' it then!" We urge Bono, Hirst and all the artists involved to cancel the auction and Stop Iatrogenic AIDS. We invite the artists to acquaint themselves with a few of the following facts about AZT and ART: AZT causes Cancer "The effect of AZT on body cells on the whole is very deleterious because it prevents cells from replicating. There is a second point in that cells that may survive AZT may themselves become cancerous so there is a double danger for AZT. " - Dr. Robert Hoffman, Professor of Cancer Biology University of California, San Diego; AZT-Cause for Concern, Dispatches, Channel 4 1992. AZT causes AIDS "AZT is a prescription drug and according to the manufacturer itself it causes symptoms that are indistinguishable from AIDS. So I would say it is not arrogant for me to say that AZT is AIDS by prescription." - Peter Duesberg, Professor of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley. Failure of HIV Science "My work as a mathematical biologist has been built in large part on the paradigm that HIV causes AIDS, and I have since come to realize that there is good evidence that the entire basis for this theory is wrong. AIDS, it seems, is not a disease so much as a sociopolitical construct that few people understand and even fewer question...Why have we as a society been so quick to accept a theory for which so little solid evidence exists? For over twenty years, the general public has been greatly misled and ill-informed." - Rebecca V. Culshaw, Ph.D., Why I Quit HIV; Lew Rockwell, March 3, 2006.   AZT hastens Death "I think AZT can only hasten the demise of the individual. It’s an immune disease and AZT only further harms an already decimated immune system." – Professor Jay Levy, Director of the Laboratory for Tumour and AIDS Virus Research, University of California at San Francisco, Newsday, 12 June (1990).   AZT and ART cause nerve damage "AZT and other nucleoside analogue drugs are much more toxic than we considered previously. … The layer of fat-storing cells directly beneath the skin, which wastes away … is loaded with mitochondria … other commonside effects of [AZT and similar drugs are] nerve and muscle damage, pancreatitis and decreased production of blood cells … all resemble conditions caused by inherited mitochondrial diseases." – (Brinkman et al. The Lancet 354(9184): 1112-5 1999). AZT damages pregnant women "You are justified in sounding a warning against the long-term therapeutic use of AZT, or its use in pregnant women, because of its demonstrated toxicity and side effects. Unfortunately, the devastating effects of AZT emerged only after the final level of experiments were well underway, that is, the experiments which consisted of giving AZT to large numbers of human patients over a long period of time. Your effort is a worthy one … I hope you succeed in convincing your government not to make AZT available." – Professor Richard Beltz, inventor of AZT in 1961, to Adv Brink, 11 May 2000. ART birth defects in newborn babies "Children born to HIV-positive women who take antiretroviral therapy (ART) during pregnancy are significantly smaller in terms of height, weight and head circumference compared with children born to HIV-positive women not on ART, or who took monotherapy, according to the results of a European study examining the effects of ART on uninfected children's growth up to the age of 18 months. " [European Collaborative Study, JAIDS 40(3): 364-370 (2005)] – Edwin Bernard, AIDSmap News, 3 November (2005). Growing evidence against HIV Establishment "Look, there’s no sociological mystery here … It’s just people’s income and position being threatened. That’s why they’re so nasty. In the AIDS field, there is a widespread neurosis among scientists. There’s just so much slowly accumulating evidence against them. It’s really hard for them to deal with it. They made a really big mistake and they’re not ever going to fix it. They’re still poisoning people. " – Dr Kary Mullis, 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Out of Control: AIDS and the corruption of medical science, Celia Farber, Harper’s Magazine, March 2006. Alex Verney-Elliott Artists against ART www.alexalienart.com Joan Shenton Immunity Resource Foundation www.immunity.org.uk Mike Hersee HEAL London www.heallondon.org

World AIDS Day 2007 - Deconstructing 'HIV'
Amun: 12/01/07 05:38 AM

Ten years ago electronmicrographs (EMs) were published in Virology, March 1997 (Gluschankof et al and Bess et al) clearly depicting what was assumed to be 'HIV' was in fact cellular debris and mircrovesicles proving that no one is 'HIV' positive but rather 'positive' for an arbitrary assortment of microvesicles and cellular debris. What has wrongly been named as 'HIV is merely an endogenous epiphenomenon of microvesicles and nebulous cellular matter. These historic EMs deconstruct 'HIV' showing that there was no 'purified HIV' there to begin with but rather cellular contamination instead.

It is the papers by the proponents of the 'HIV' hypothesis who actually take it apart and expose its flaws, absurdities, anomalies, errors and contradictions, along with history (time) which is always the greatest deconstructive critique for it is time itself that unravels and exposes the 'HIV' hypothesis as failed, unfounded and ungrounded. Deconstruction - as Derrida stated - is always already at work within texts - and all papers that purport to propagate 'HIV' are actually arguing that 'HIV' does not exist.

Hans Gelderblom of Berlin's Robert Koch Institute co-authored the first paper in Virology showing 'purified HIV' to be 'purified microvesicles'. What was assumed to be 'purified HIV' was in fact "an excess of vesicles" - particles of cellular proteins. The hypothetical 'HIV' is in fact a collection of endogenous microvesicles and cellular proteins (which also never seem to form particles - so how can they be infectious)?

The key fact to remember is that cell-free infectious 'HIV' viral particles have never, repeat never, been visualised, isolated and recovered from fresh donor blood and semen. To date: 'HIV' has never been visualised under electron microscopy so there is no empirical evidence that anyone is 'HIV' positive and all the images you have been shown are coloured-in computerized fantasies with dishs-aerials.

The rules demonstrating the existence of 'HIV' (and retroviruses in general) were never adhered to by those who devised them nor were they ever validated. No particle of 'HIV' has ever been obtained pure, free of contaminants; nor has a complete piece of 'HIV RNA' (or the transcribed DNA) ever been proved to exist.

So confident am I that no such electron-micrograph evidence for the existence of 'HIV' can be produced by adhering strictly to the Etienne de Harven methodology, I am prepared to offer the sum of $100,000 to the first person to submit just such a micrograph, prepared under stringent laboratory conditions. I do not want 'markers' for 'viral activity' which are at very best, inaccurate. I want visual evidence of myriad active, infectious viral particles, clearly morphologically defined recovered from a fresh sample of bodily fluid, unadulterated with any other kinds of cells: i.e: CEM,H9 cancer cells. As Peter Duesberg and Harvey Bialy stated in Nature: "...infectious units, after all, are the only clinically relevant criteria for a viral pathogen." (Nature, 375, 1995, p. 197) Once again, to paraphrase Peter Duesberg, an alleged 'virus' which is not doing anything cannot be 'causing' anything.

As Virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka observed: The rules demonstrating the existence of HIV (and retroviruses in general) were never adhered to by those who devised them nor were they ever validated. No particle of HIV has ever been obtained pure, free of contaminants; nor has a complete piece of 'HIV RNA' (or the transcribed DNA) ever been proved to exist.

Dr. Stefan Lanka stated: "I found that when they are speaking about HIV they are not speaking about a virus. They are speaking about cellular characteristics and activities of cells under very special conditions...I realized that the whole group of viruses to which HIV is said to belong, the retroviruses, in fact do not exist at all." (Zenger's Magazine, December, 1998).

We need to 'raise awareness' that:
'HIV' is not a retrovirus.
'HIV' is not an STI/STD.
'HIV' does not cause 'AIDS'.
No one is 'living with HIV.'

'HIV' DOES NOT EXIST

World AIDS Day 2007
Alex Verney-Elliott, London

Crystal meth can make you test 'HIV' positive       01/18/07 04:26 AM Alex Russell

In the United Kingdom from January 18, 2007 crystal meth is to be reclassified in the UK as a “Class A” drug. Crystal meth is now classed among the most harmful drugs. Poppers (Amyl-, Butyl-, and Isobutyl-Nitrite) should also now be upgraded and reclassified as a “Class A” drug because the illegal drugs long-term effects can be lethal to gay men’s health. In the early 1980s poppers were documented to cause the development of KS (Kaposi's sarcoma) which was one of the original ‘AIDS’ defining conditions. Crystal meth and poppers are contributing to ‘AIDS’ amongst gay men and not the hypothetical ‘HIV’. Chemical agents in drugs like crystal meth and cocaine can stimulate cells to express hitherto dormant passenger viruses which are then misidentified as being the hypothetical ‘HIV’. Crystal meth was recently found to manufacture a synthetic (artificial) ‘new strain of HIV’ in a New York patient. It has been argued and demonstrated that crystal meth is making gay men test ‘HIV’ positive (and – ironically – not the non-isolated ‘HIV’). The Body readers may be too young to remember that up to 1983 ‘AIDS’ was originally called GRID (Gay Related Immune Deficiency) and was acknowledged to be caused by recreational drug addiction on the commercial gay scene. Remember: all the original ‘AID’S cases in the United States were young gay men who were recreational drug users with PCP and KS; and all the heavy crystal meth and poppers-uses had KS. To repeat: crystal meth, along with ecstasy, special K, MDA, quaaludes, LSD, cocaine, and poppers were seen as the original causes of ‘AIDS’ amongst gay men in the late 1970s and the early 1980s before ‘HIV’ was ‘invented’ as the ‘politically correct’ cause of ‘AIDS’. But today we (conveniently) forget that in the early 1980s the medical literature considered ‘AIDS’ to be GRID (Gay Related Immune Deficiency) caused by the drug-induced gay life and history now shows this hypothesis to be correct (even if ‘politically incorrect’ and ‘unfashionable’). As Prof. Peter Duesberg has observed: in the West, ‘AIDS’ is caused by long-term recreational drug use and in the developing world ‘AIDS’ is caused by TB, malaria and disease conditions relating to poverty and malnutrition. We are now seeing the spread of drug-induced ‘AIDS’ in Russia where there are growing drug epidemics; globally, wherever we see drug epidemics we also see the spread of 'false-HIV-positivity' because recreational drugs are well know now to make the non-specific ‘HIV’ tests to run ‘positive’. No one is ‘HIV positive’ – they are 'drug-positive’. Recreational drugs are making many gay men test ‘HIV’ positive. We must call on the Terrence Higgins Trust and Gay Men Fighting AIDS to warn gay men that crystal meth and poppers can cause ‘AIDS’ amongst gay men and crystal meth and cocaine are well documented (in the medical literature) to make the non-specific ‘HIV’ tests to run ‘positive’. The THT and GMFA have been irresponsibly and unethically been misinforming gay men for over 20 years now of the Drug/AIDS hypothesis whilst uncritically endorsing the profitable but still unproven HIV/AIDS hypothesis. Gay men are not testing ‘HIV’ positive because of ‘HIV’ but because of ‘life-style choices’ like recreational drug use – but the THT & GMFA – and the gay community (whatever that is) are still in ‘denial’ about the true situation and still need blind ‘HIV’ belief to mask this reality (also because gay men never want to grow up and love living in a fantasy world like the ‘HIV’ fantasy world). Whilst the THT has called the reclassification of crystal meth as a “pragmatic move” that brings it in line with other drugs of this nature, it does not go far enough in warning gay men that it can cause 'AIDS' through long term use. The THT and GMFA should also demand the upgrading of poppers to a “Class A” drug but they will never do this because poppers make millions of pounds profit for the commercial gay scene where pink profit is always seen as far more important than gay men’s health. Will Nutland, the THTs head of health promotion stated: “Experiences from other parts of the world show us that crystal meth can have a detrimental effect on communities as well as the lives of individuals,” said “This decision increases the powers and resources available to the police and enables them to do more to tackle crystal meth use in the UK. However, reclassification needs to come hand in hand with funding for education and effective treatment services.” Recreational drugs like crystal meth are actually causing ‘AIDS’ (GRID) amongst gay men as well as making them test ‘HIV’ positive and it is high time that the Terrence Higgins Trust and Gay Men Fighting AIDS began to ‘inform’ them of these brute facts - and stop living in the cosy careerist and concealed ‘HIV’ mass-hypnosis group-fantasy trance. When will the THT and GMFA wake up from their politics of denial and warn gay men of the real causes of ‘AIDS’ (GRID) and ‘inform’ gay men that ‘HIV’ does not exist?

An Open Letter to the THT & GMFA: Making Crystal meth & Poppers Class A Drugs

AZT on Trial at The Hague

AIDS Myth Exposed  MSN Groups

World AIDS Day 2006: Raising 'HIV/AIDS' Awareness       A.R. 12/01/06 06:16 AM

World AIDS Day 2006: Raising 'HIV/AIDS' Awareness We urgently need to raise 'HIV/AIDS' Awareness to stop the epidemic spread of AIDS-related Myths, HIV-related Lies and Pharmogenocide: Iatrogenic 'AIDS' ('AIDS' caused by 'anti-retroviral' drugs). World AIDS Day should be renamed as World LIES Day - for World AIDS Day is a day of Lies, Lies, and Lies to keep the 'HIV' Lie Machine and 'HIV' Careerists continue with their profitable pharmogenocide lies. We need to 'raise awareness' that: 'HIV' is not a retrovirus. 'HIV' is not an STI/STD. 'HIV' does not cause 'AIDS'. No one is 'living with HIV.' No one is 'HIV' positive. Cell-free 'HIV' has never been found or recovered in fresh samples of semen or blood. The fact to remember is that cell-free infectious 'HIV' viral particles have never, repeat never, been recovered from fresh donor semen and blood. 'HIV' have never been visualised under electron microscopy. Whilst 'HIV' is not an infection, 'HIV' Ideology is highly 'infectious' and 'contagious' and 'spread' through the 'HIV' Interpellation techniques such as the highly hypnotic 'HIV' Testing ritual rites of 'HIV' Indoctrination and 'HIV' Propaganda - with pernicious lies like: 'Everyone is at Risk!' There is no such thing as 'HIV' Science only 'HIV' Politics, 'HIV' Propaganda, 'HIV' Theology - for 'HIV' has become the new 'GOD': blind 'GOD' Belief has been displaced by blind 'HIV' Belief. But the weak ones of the world want to believe in 'God' - the weak ones of the world want to believe in 'HIV': they need something to worship and fear all at once: yet 'GOD' - like 'HIV' - does not exist. The weak ones of the world - 'the they' - want to believe in nothing rather than themselves: they need the 'nothing-GOD' - they need the 'nothing-HIV'. If you tell 'the they' - the weak ones of the world - that 'GOD' and 'HIV' do not exist they will become hysterical, irrational, panic, and scream a stream of invective expletives and emotive abuse at you pulling chimpanzee grimaces and spitting at you and then drooling like a rabid dog growling with madness and sadness: for they desperately need a big daddy father figure to fuck them into submissive passivity of slave morality: 'HIV' is the new 'GOD' they need to control them, order them, to rule them, to enslave them: 'HIV' Belief like 'GOD' Belief is Slave Morality! Both 'GOS' and 'HIV' have never been isolated as unique identities in themselves but are an epiphenmomenon of a thing yet unidentified and thus misidentified: there is not GOD' like there is no 'HIV'. The (political) taxonomic classification of 'HIV' was a tragic case of mistaken identity: the thing had no properties of the name baptised: 'it' was never proven to cause 'immunodeficiency' or even to be a 'virus' at all. The taxonomic classification of 'HIV' (22-23 May, 1986) was ostensibly a strategic invention to present a nomenclature that would unify a diversely identified putative 'retrovirus': human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III ('HTLV-III'), immunodeficiency-associated virus ('IDAV'), aids-associated retrovirus ('ARV') and lymphadenopathy-associated virus ('LAV'). The not so hidden agenda behind this politically expedient move was to enforce the 'belief' that an alleged 'human retrovirus' caused 'immunodeficiency'. Like 'GOD' does not exist 'HIV' does not exist so we must de-programme and 'raise awareness' amongst 'diagnosed' (hypnotised) homosexuals and blacks that they are not 'HIV' positive: they must be 'informed' of the following facts: 'HI'V is not sexually transmitted. It is only ever been an assumption that 'HIV' is an STI based on the apparent existence of clusters of cases. 'HIV' is merely an endogenous marker for oxidative stress, antigenic overload and recreational drug use in the West. Testing 'HIV positive' merely indicates a cluster of people who had indulged in identical behaviour: it is important to remember that originally clusters of cases of beriberi, pellagra and scurvy were also assumed to be caused by a transmissible infection: all this was subsequently shown to be totally wrong. Beriberi, pellagra and scurvy were not caused by a transmissible agent but were all caused by a shared vitamin deficiency. Similarly: 'AIDS' is not caused by a transmissible agent ('HIV') but by exposure to multiple pathogenic insults caused by life style in the West and by well known endemic conditions relating to Third World countries. No one 's 'HIV' positive at all. Hans Gelderblom of Berlin's Robert Koch Institute co-authored the first paper in Virology, March 1997, showing 'purified HIV' to be 'purified microvesicles'. What was assumed to be 'purified HIV' was in fact "an excess of vesicles" - particles of cellular proteins. The hypothetical 'HIV' is in fact a collection of endogenous microvesicles and cellular proteins (which also never seem to form particles - so how can they be infectious)? Cell-free viral 'HIV' particles have never ever been visualised in any freshly donated bodily fluid including semen, blood, etc. 'HIV' has never ever proven to be a sexually transmitted retrovirus. As Virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka observed: The rules demonstrating the existence of HIV (and retroviruses in general) were never adhered to by those who devised them nor were they ever validated. No particle of HIV has ever been obtained pure, free of contaminants; nor has a complete piece of 'HIV RNA' (or the transcribed DNA) ever been proved to exist. Dr. Stefan Lanka stated: "I found that when they are speaking about HIV they are not speaking about a virus. They are speaking about cellular characteristics and activities of cells under very special conditions...I realized that the whole group of viruses to which HIV is said to belong, the retroviruses, in fact do not exist at all." (Zenger's Magazine, December, 1998). 'HIV/AIDS' (pseudo)science is consensus science and consensus science is bad science: it is only those who have thought beyond, around or above the prevailing paradigm who have ever truly advanced the course of science and medicine. Those who believe that something is true because 'everybody says so' would do well to remember the wrong opinions concerning scurvy, pelllagra, beriberi, and smon - and blush for shame. "A theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements: It must accurately describe a large class of observations on the basis of a model that contains only a few arbitrary elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations." Stephen Hawking None of the predictions based on the 'HIV/AIDS' hypothesis has ever been fulfilled and never can be because the hypothesis is wrong. "There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS - for many reasons but most importantly, because there is no proof that HIV exists." Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos, Is HIV the cause of AIDS?, Continuum, Autumn 1997. "The HIV hypothesis ranks with the 'bad air' theory for malaria and the 'bacterial infection' theory of beriberi and pellagra [caused by nutritional deficiencies]. It is a hoax that became a scam." Dr. Bernard Forscher, Conspiracy of Silence, The Sunday Times, 3 April 1994. "Scientists will then have to come to terms with the awful fact that the AIDS epidemic was a mirage manufactured by scientists who believed that integrity could be maintained amidst the diverting influences of big money, prestige and politics." Professor Hiram Caton, Conspiracy of Silence, The Sunday Times, April 1994. "I propose there are no human retroviruses. 'HIV' is not Human, it has never been proven to be the cause of Immunodeficiency, and is not a Virus, but a misinterpreted artefact of human and simian cell cultures. Therefore the acronym 'HIV' is wrong on all counts." Michel Verney-Elliott, 'SIV' and Poliovaccination - A Shot In The Foot?, 1999. "I found that when they are speaking about HIV they are not speaking about a virus. They are speaking about cellular characteristics and activities of cells under very special conditions...I realized that the whole group of viruses to which HIV is said to belong, the retroviruses, in fact do not exist at all." Dr. Stefan Lanka, Virologist, Zenger's, December, 1998. "Where is the research that says HIV is the cause of AIDS? If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There is no such document." Dr. Kary Mullis, Biochemist, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry, The Sunday Times, 28 November 1993. "The HIV-causes-AIDS dogma represents the grandest and perhaps the most morally destructive fraud that has ever been perpetrated on the young men and women of the Western world." Dr. Charles Thomas, Conspiracy of Silence, The Sunday Times, April 1994. To end on a humorous note: Bono, the aging singer of the band U2 is famous throughout the world for being a creepy AIDS Pharmogenocidist careerist. Playing at a recent U2 concert in Glasgow, Scotland, Bono asked the audience for total quiet and then in the silence started to slowly clap his hands, once every few seconds. Holding the audience in total silence, he said into the microphone, "Every time I clap my hands, a child in Africa dies." A voice with a broad Scot